What was untouchability? Why was this untouchability in world and in India? For which kind of untouchability dr ambedkar fought and did struggles?
In simple words if I explain it then it was the discrimination of upper cast people on lower cast peoples by any method like morally reprehensible or fight etc.
But when and from where this untouchability start and what was the reality of untouchability? Have you ever thought about it ? What was the main motive of Untouchability? Is this still exists in any way ?
This untouchability started from the time of kings and their kingdoms. From that time there became division of work like potter did their work and carpenters did their work and like that there next generations also started doing this work and this developed a sense that rich peoples were rich and poors were poors in society and this develope a different in peoples and their thoughts.
Untouchability was a curse for lower cast peoples and poor peoples. The difference of jobs in the ancient period became the caste system.
But this untouchability was grown by other peoples who just wanted their profit. Now the question is how their profit? In many ways they took the profit of untouchability like they could force lower cast peoples to do what they want. They treated the untouchables as human without of any dignity and self respect. If we talk about how this process( untouchability) got abolished then the first name comes in our mind is of dr ambedkar who fought with all his potential and give every people a sense of equality and if i talk about how much time this process took for end then we have to think about from when this process began. If this process took time to begin then this process also took too much time to got an end.
Now i think that this process doesn't exist but in some areas this still may exist but because of education the peoples are getting educated and be aware so they don't think about untouchability and they do not practice it but if we talk about its fully end then this process will get to an end in some days.
In other words:-
untouchability
India is a land of sages, sages, sages and saints and many types of religions. The land of this country spews gold, but its Along with this, oceans of knowledge will also be seen praising you here.
Many such incidents have also happened on this earth whose imagination
cannot be done.
There is no doubt that Hindu religion is considered to be the ocean of knowledge. Tried to benefit many people of the world from the great and holy books of Hindu religion, among them he tried to teach the lessons of knowledge to his countrymen.
There was a time when many foreign students came to India to get education, one who was a scholar was a Brahmin who was not educated and was considered ignorant.
The difference between "ignorance and learning" had divided human beings into two parts. If seen, this was the only line inside humanity which considered class as its basis, which later took the form of hatred. No one knew that this form would be so disgusting.
But who has stopped the pace of time till today, all that was thought did not happen, but the germs of hatred did arise. Man started hating man. You will call it untouchability or the mistake of mankind. Particularly the mistake of the Hindu caste who killed himself with an ax on his own feet. With untouchability and discrimination, we started defaming our own religion. I do not understand that such teaching is given anywhere in any book of our religion. When the answer is no, then why this untouchability? Why do humans hate humans?
Today, even after forty-eight years of independence, the same atmosphere prevails in small towns and villages, barring the big cities, people could not fill the gap between Harijans and Swarn Hindus.
Although there is no doubt that today our government has spent the most attention on this, but this thing is not of today, it is from the childhood of Baba Saheb when the British rulers were looting the people of India but at the same time they We were also looking at how to establish our roots in India. only one thing came to his mind
"Divide, rule."
You can call it politics.
But what kind of politics is this that brother should be separated from brother. Maybe the British tried to take full advantage of this casteism of ours. This seed was already sown.
What was castism? Why was it ? Is it exists?
birth of racism
The credit for maintaining the superiority of mankind in the world could have gone to humanity itself, but looking at the past shows that we ourselves are behind the birth of casteism, but its aim is not hatred, but every man should be treated for facility to work according to ability was to be given because every class has to be taken care of in order to run the royal lessons, then it was a matter of time when the kings used to fight more. One king was always ready to attack another king.
On such occasions, there was a lot of difficulty in running the government, then all the scholars together advised the king that if you want to run your kingdom properly, then give the name of a class to every person according to his ability and karma.
When the matter of the scholars was accepted by the king, at the same time the king called a special meeting of his scholars and took this decision in it.
1. The man who is knowledgeable, intelligent and gives education is a brahmin
Will go His caste will be Brahmin.
2. Those who will do business, do business, they will belong to Vaishya caste.
3. Those who will be brave, will be brave, will join the army, they will be Kshatriyas.
4. Those who will serve all of this. Those public servants will be called Harijans.
It was from here that casteism was born, not the evil spirit of any class was working behind it, but this feeling was working behind it that everyone should be engaged in their work according to their ability. According to constitution castism should not exist now.
Inferiority is a crime.
I have told my readers earlier that no inferiority complex was working behind the birth of casteism, rather it was given to it on the basis of its karma. A similar incident occurs in a story from Mahabharata. When Dharmaraja asked this question to Dharmaputra Yudhishthira
Who is a Brahmin in your eyes?
O Dharmaraja! A brahmin is not born by birth, but a true brahmin is one who does the work of a brahmin. One who is learned, is knowledgeable, only he can be called brahmin.
Exactly the same thing can be said about the feeling of casteism that it is based only on karma.
By taking birth in any caste, a creature cannot become that which is associated with its caste. If this is accepted to be true, then what about Maharishi Valmiki ji who was born in a small caste in the opinion of the people.
But he wrote Ramayana, the holy book of Hinduism. Now, in casteism, someone should go to the priests and ask who was Valmiki ji?
Maharishis who were and will remain revered or the deserving of hatred born in a small caste, such last examples are found in our history in which the names of Mahatma Kabir and Sant Ravidas are prominent. As long as such people lived, the upper class of our society hated them, but they were devotees of God.
Mahapandit Chanakya ji has said in this subject that even if gold is lying in an impure place, then one should never hesitate to lift it.
If education is received even from a poor man, then he should be considered as his guru and should receive education.
If there is a beautiful and virtuous girl in the wicked lineage, then one should not hesitate to marry her.
* If we keep these thoughts of Chanakya ji in front of us today, then this hateful atmosphere of casteism will be seen to end automatically.
Rebellion is born out of hatred. Especially when we look at the society one hundred years back from today, it does not take us long to understand that the effect of casteism was very much at that time.
From the birth of Baba Saheb on 14th April, 1891, when we have entered the end of the twentieth century, then it automatically comes to your understanding that the poison that the Muslim rulers had spread in our society at that time had its effect on the British. It was further increased by the coming because both these religions had the same goal, that goal was to break the most sacred and powerful Hindu religion in the world. Then these two foreign rulers had only one power to stay in India, that was
"Divide, Rule"
Casteism was the only way to divide. By racism creating hatred among people of the same type of people who follow the same religion.
The same thing happened .
At the time of Babasaheb's birth, along with the British, the propagators of Christianity also entered India rapidly because it was known to the British rulers that millions of Hindus had been converted to Islam by the force of the sword under the Mughal rule.
Not only this, a tax named "Ek Jizya" was imposed on Hindus, which only the Hindu caste had to pay. Many poor people were forced to convert to religion when they could not pay this tax. In this, the number of people from the lower castes was more because they were poor poor people.
In the British Raj, Christians started making Christians by giving them the lure of machinery, money and good jobs. He got success in this work because of this. The small caste people whom people hated, when they left names like Ruldu, Raliya and took the names of Christianity like Robert, Albert, Tony and called themselves Christian, then the walls of this hatred fell. Change of religion led to change of karma. When Albert was prosperous, he hated Shambhu.
But why so ? Who was guilty of this?
What was the result of hatred towards people of one's own religion? That is not the loss of religion!
There was already no shortage of external enemies of Hindu religion, but when the people of their own house are bent on destroying the house so what will happen to that house?
Readers should remember that India is made up of only a few big villages. What do the people of the palace know about the lives of those villagers?
The seeds of real hatred are sown in those villages only from where casteism begins. Ambedkar ji in one such village. was born. The death of the mother at a young age took away the mother's love from that child and left her to weep.
0 Comments
If you have any doubts so please let me know.